Drug eluting and bare metal stents in people with and without diabetes: collaborative network meta-analysis

نویسندگان

  • Christoph Stettler
  • Sabin Allemann
  • Simon Wandel
  • Adnan Kastrati
  • Marie Claude Morice
  • Albert Schömig
  • Matthias E Pfisterer
  • Gregg W Stone
  • Martin B Leon
  • José Suárez de Lezo
  • Jean-Jacques Goy
  • Seung-Jung Park
  • Manel Sabaté
  • Maarten J Suttorp
  • Henning Kelbaek
  • Christian Spaulding
  • Maurizio Menichelli
  • Paul Vermeersch
  • Maurits T Dirksen
  • Pavel Cervinka
  • Marco De Carlo
  • Andrejs Erglis
  • Tania Chechi
  • Paolo Ortolani
  • Martin J Schalij
  • Peter Diem
  • Bernhard Meier
  • Stephan Windecker
  • Peter Jüni
چکیده

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and safety of three types of stents (sirolimus eluting, paclitaxel eluting, and bare metal) in people with and without diabetes mellitus. DESIGN Collaborative network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), relevant websites, reference lists, conference abstracts, reviews, book chapters, and proceedings of advisory panels for the US Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturers and trialists provided additional data. REVIEW METHODS Network meta-analysis with a mixed treatment comparison method to combine direct within trial comparisons between stents with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation. Overall mortality was the primary safety end point, target lesion revascularisation the effectiveness end point. RESULTS 35 trials in 3852 people with diabetes and 10,947 people without diabetes contributed to the analyses. Inconsistency of the network was substantial for overall mortality in people with diabetes and seemed to be related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (P value for interaction 0.02). Restricting the analysis to trials with a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more, inconsistency was reduced considerably and hazard ratios for overall mortality were near one for all comparisons in people with diabetes: sirolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.88 (95% credibility interval 0.55 to 1.30), paclitaxel eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.91 (0.60 to 1.38), and sirolimus eluting stents compared with paclitaxel eluting stents 0.95 (0.63 to 1.43). In people without diabetes, hazard ratios were unaffected by the restriction. Both drug eluting stents were associated with a decrease in revascularisation rates compared with bare metal stents in people both with and without diabetes. CONCLUSION In trials that specified a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more after stent implantation, drug eluting stents seemed safe and effective in people both with and without diabetes.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Outcomes with various drug eluting or bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: mixed treatment comparison analysis of 22 844 patient years of follow-up from randomised trials

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of currently used drug eluting stents compared with each other and compared with bare metal stents in patients with diabetes. DESIGN Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomised clinical trials, until April 2012, of four durable polymer drug eluting stents (s...

متن کامل

INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND SURGERY Efficacy of drug eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: indirect comparison of controlled trials

Objective: To examine whether polymer based coronary stents eluting sirolimus or paclitaxel are equally effective in patients with and without diabetes. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis by indirect comparison of randomised controlled trials comparing stents eluting sirolimus or paclitaxel with conventional bare metal stents. The overall study population and patients with and without...

متن کامل

Efficacy of drug eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: indirect comparison of controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE To examine whether polymer based coronary stents eluting sirolimus or paclitaxel are equally effective in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis by indirect comparison of randomised controlled trials comparing stents eluting sirolimus or paclitaxel with conventional bare metal stents. The overall study population and patients with and without...

متن کامل

Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in percutaneous coronary interventions (a meta-analysis).

This meta-analysis combined the results of randomized clinical trials to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting stents with that of bare metal stents in percutaneous coronary interventions to ascertain which revascularization strategy is most safe and effective. The literature identified 13 published studies, and 8 were included in the main meta-analysis, thus allowing a meta-analysis on 3,860 pa...

متن کامل

Diabetes is still a risk factor for restenosis after drug-eluting stent in coronary arteries.

We read with interest the metaanalysis of the effect of diabetes on restenosis rates among patients receiving coronary angioplasty stenting (1). This meta-analysis of six clinical trials showed that the odds ratio (OR) of coronary artery restenosis associated with diabetes was 1.61 (95% CI 1.21-2.14, P = 0.004) in univariate logistic regression models, but it decreased to 1.30 (0.99-1.70, P = 0...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • BMJ : British Medical Journal

دوره 337  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008